← Failure Modes Index ← GEO Overview

Conflicting or excessive structured data reduces confidence and citation eligibility.

When multiple conflicting schema types appear on the same page, or when schema markup is excessive, generative engines observe:

• Conflicting entity definitions for the same concept
• Multiple schema types competing to describe the same content
• Excessive schema markup that dilutes signal strength
• Inconsistent structured data signals across page elements
• Schema types that contradict page content

The model cannot resolve which schema definition is authoritative, so confidence drops for all variants.

Confidence drops because:

1. Signal conflict: Multiple schema types provide contradictory information about the same entity
2. Signal dilution: Excessive schema markup reduces the strength of individual signals
3. Entity ambiguity: The system cannot resolve which schema definition represents the true entity
4. Trust degradation: Conflicting signals indicate unreliable data, reducing overall trust scores

When schema noise occurs, generative engines ignore:

• All conflicting schema definitions (none achieve sufficient confidence)
• Excessive schema markup beyond what is necessary
• Structured data that contradicts page content
• Schema types that compete to describe the same entity

The system defaults to ignoring all structured data signals rather than selecting one arbitrarily.

Schema noise is triggered by:

• Multiple schema types: Article, BlogPosting, and WebPage schema all describing the same content
• Conflicting entity definitions: Organization schema with different names or URLs on the same page
• Excessive markup: Hundreds of schema objects on a single page
• Contradictory data: Schema claiming one date while content shows another
• Nested conflicts: Schema objects that contradict their parent schema definitions
• Automated schema generation: Plugins or tools that add schema without validation

When schema noise occurs, we observe:

• Content disappears from AI Overviews and LLM answers despite having schema markup
• Structured data fails to improve citation eligibility
• Retrieval confidence scores remain below threshold
• Competitor content with clean schema replaces the noisy content
• Schema validation tools report errors or warnings

These outcomes are observable and measurable through retrieval monitoring and schema validation.

This failure pattern represents a negative decision trace, where confidence drops below retrieval thresholds. Decision traces in generative search explain how these patterns accumulate and influence future retrieval decisions.

To mitigate schema noise:

1. Use single schema type: Choose one primary schema type per page that accurately describes the content
2. Remove conflicting schemas: Eliminate duplicate or contradictory schema definitions
3. Validate schema markup: Use schema validation tools to identify conflicts and errors
4. Ensure schema accuracy: Verify that schema data matches page content exactly
5. Avoid excessive markup: Include only necessary schema properties, not every possible field
6. Monitor for conflicts: Regularly audit schema markup for contradictions or duplication

Once schema markup is clean and unambiguous, confidence scores improve and retrieval probability increases.

• All Failure Modes →