Prechunking Content Engineering
A Systems-Level Course for LLM Ingestion, Retrieval, and Citation
This is an operator course, not documentation.
The goal is to teach how to design content that:
- chunks deterministically
- is extractable and reusable by generative systems
- vectorizes cleanly
- minimizes cross-chunk inference cost
- survives retrieval without hallucination
- is safe to cite
How to Use This Course
This course is designed for flexible learning:
- You can read sequentially (Module 1 → 9) or jump to specific topics
- Each module is atomic and self-contained—no prerequisites required
- This is not a checklist course. Mastery comes from understanding constraints, not finishing pages
- Modules reference each other, but you can read them in any order
Think of this as a knowledge system, not a linear curriculum. Return to modules as needed. Deep understanding matters more than completion.
Course Mental Model
LLMs ingest the web like a distributed data lake:
- Pages = raw files
- DOM = semi-structured records
- Chunks = rows
- Embeddings = indexes
- Retrieval = approximate joins
- Context window = memory budget
- Citation = confidence threshold crossing
Prechunking is schema design for untrusted data sources. Chunking is the method. Extractability is the outcome.
Course Modules
This course is broken into modules, each with a single learning objective. Each module is its own page for optimal LLM ingestion and retrieval.
How LLMs Actually Chunk Content
Why "sections" are not real chunks. Token-based chunking, DOM boundary heuristics, sentence vs semantic chunking.
Key Truth: LLMs do not respect paragraphs, headings, or visual sections. They chunk based on token limits, punctuation density, semantic similarity, and transformer attention patterns.
Practical Rule: If a fact requires previous text, it is already broken.
Chunk Atomicity and Inference Cost
Why multi-fact chunks fail retrieval. Each chunk is a row. Each row should answer one question.
Key Truth: If an LLM must resolve pronouns, infer scope, merge facts, or assume context, it increases CPU cost, hallucination risk, and citation avoidance.
Practical Rule: One chunk = one assertion = one retrieval target.
Vectorization and Semantic Collisions
Why vague chunks lose embedding battles. Embeddings collapse meaning into dense vectors.
Key Truth: If a chunk contains multiple ideas, mixed intent, or generic language, its vector becomes non-dominant. Your content exists but never wins nearest-neighbor retrieval.
Practical Rule: Each chunk must be semantically narrow, lexically explicit, and intent-pure.
Data Structuring Beyond Pages
Prechunking is not just page layout. Structured layers: JSON-LD, lists, tables, definitions, repeated factual patterns.
Key Truth: Structured data reduces inference depth, ambiguity, and retrieval risk. LLMs trust structured repetition more than prose.
Practical Rule: Important facts must exist in multiple structural forms.
Cross-Page Consistency as Signal Amplification
Why single-page optimization fails. LLMs evaluate cross-source agreement, consistency across contexts, and repeated factual phrasing.
Key Truth: LLMs evaluate cross-source agreement, consistency across contexts, and repeated factual phrasing. This is not duplication. This is data reinforcement.
Practical Rule: Facts must repeat across pages, across sections, across formats. But never change meaning.
Prompt Reverse-Engineering (Safely)
How to infer questions without prompt injection. You are not manipulating prompts. You are modeling question distributions.
Key Truth: You are not manipulating prompts. You are modeling question distributions: primary user questions, follow-up questions, trust questions, safety constraints.
Practical Rule: If a question can be asked, its answer must already exist as a chunk.
Citation Eligibility Engineering
Why AI avoids citing most content. LLMs avoid citing content that sounds promotional, makes guarantees, lacks scope, or mixes opinion and fact.
Key Truth: LLMs avoid citing content that sounds promotional, makes guarantees, lacks scope, or mixes opinion and fact.
Practical Rule: Write chunks that are factual, scoped, boring, and safe. Boring content gets cited.
Measuring Prechunking Success
What to measure instead of rankings. Real metrics: retrieval appearance, answer reuse, citation frequency, near-verbatim reuse, cross-engine consistency.
Key Truth: Real metrics are retrieval appearance, answer reuse, citation frequency, near-verbatim reuse, and cross-engine consistency. Traffic, impressions, and CTR are downstream effects, not controls.
Practical Rule: Measure retrieval and citation, not traffic and impressions.
Failure Modes (Why Chunks Die)
Why content disappears from AI answers. Common failures: pronouns, implied context, mixed services, marketing adjectives, narrative transitions.
Key Truth: Common failures include pronouns, implied context, mixed services, marketing adjectives, and narrative transitions.
Practical Rule: If a chunk cannot stand alone, delete it.
Related Documentation
For reference documentation and specifications:
- Prechunking SEO - Discipline definition and doctrine
- Core Concepts - Data shaping, croutons, precogs
- Crouton Specification - Atomic fact structures
- Precog Modeling - Intent forecasting
- Prechunking Workflow - Implementation process